Mobile antenna mounts

This is the place to discuss generalized scanner questions and information for San Diego County. Whether it's radios, antennas, or other general scanner related topics, you can talk about it here.
Post Reply
astrodanco
Posts: 21
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 11:04 am

Mobile antenna mounts

Post by astrodanco »

So what do you guys/gals think of 3/8 hole NMO mounts as opposed to 3/4 hole NMO mounts? I've been told that the smaller 3/8 hole makes the mounting significantly stronger.

While we're on the subject, what do you think of RG8X coax in mobile installations? I know, it's solid core. But man, the loss is so much lower. As long as I'm adding a NMO mount GPS antenna using RG8X, it would seem appropriate to just install all my NMO mounts with RG8X. Antenex also sells mounts with a (stranded core) Teflon coax that has low loss, but not as low loss as RG8X.

I'll be putting either a VHF/UHF/800Mhz antenna or just an 800Mhz antenna on one NMO mount and a (~1500Hhz) GPS antenna on another NMO mount. The first antenna will likely scrape my garage roof twice a day. I'd rather not throw away signal if I don't have to, particularly with the tri-band antenna which according to the specs is already -7dbi down on one of the bands (and this is a good antenna). The extra cost of 8X is just a few bucks, so I guess the only real question there is whether or not I'll be shooting myself in the foot by trying to install a solid core coax in a mobile installation (e.g., is 8X too easy to crush, bend too much, etc)? If 8X is too touchy, I should probably use Antenex Teflon coax instead.
N6ATF
Posts: 373
Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 1:36 pm

Post by N6ATF »

Bump.
Post Reply